Видео

@@michaelmelendez9902 might actually help me since i suck at it to begin with 🤣🤣

@@immunelit3859 hey dude! I was away fishing a tournament, i will weigh it today and post the weight on this comment!

@@zachharmon5883 i can do that for sure. I will try and shoot a short video this week and publish it for you. I would advise against selling the 902s, as it is different enough to justify having both 👍

@JoeyDiCienzo Lol. I don't have enough room for all my rods. Trying to consolidate and find rods I can use for multiple techniques. I just sold my NRX+ NRR. The 902S is a little too stiff/powerful for Ned's for me. I have a 7'6" ML/XF St Croix Legend Elite I was going to use for Ned's and similar applications. Was hoping I could sell it and my NRX+ 902S, and use the 891S for Ned's, keitech swimbaits 2.8/3.3, hair jigs, lighter finesse crankbaits, etc?

@@zachharmon5883 fair enough! The main difference for me is the weight ratings: i can throw slightly heavier applications on the 902s vs. 891s. For my deeper water applications (>20') i rely heavily on the 902s. I will try to cover it all in a short, and if not, maybe the video will be longer 🤣💪

@JoeyDiCienzo would the 891S be overpowered with say 1/4 oz swimbait head with a 3.3" keitech?

@@zachharmon5883 I'm sure it would work, but you run the risk of not being able to cast as efficiently (aka putting loads of power into your cast, since the rod would be maxxed out to begin with). The 3.3 keitech plastic is heavier than 1/16 oz (it's closer to 1/8 to 3/16), and adding that to the 1/4 oz head (or 4/16 oz to make the math easier) would put it slightly over the rating of the rod. That's one scenario where the 902s would be in my hands over the 891. However, the 891 would work with a 2.8 keitech or 3 sparkshad due to there being less plastic weight. This is just my opinion though!

12 lb Shimano Mastiff Fluoro

@@garethmorris2042 hi Gareth! I used to fish them in Bronte and 16 mile creek off the piers. Im not sure about how strong the numbers are there anymore but there used to be 2 to 4.5 lbers kicking around!

@JoeyDiCienzo ok thanks! Maybe it's worth launching the boat af trying in 10-20ft of water. I think it's pretty clear water and rocky which you think would be good for smallmouth.....hopefully

@@garethmorris2042 good luck!

@@The_reel_archer that would be fine on it! Done it a few times and as long as youre in sparse cover or open water, itll work👍

@@JoeyDiCienzo yup would be fishing off shore for spotted bass. I appreciate it!

I will weigh it asap and get back to you!

Thank you so much, did you get a chance to weigh it yet??

The rod weighs 2.88 oz 🙌

Thank you I sincerely appreciate it.

Thank you!

*comparing 891s GLX to 892s IMX Pro since they're the rods i have* - I found the 891s to have plenty of backbone to drive a tube or swimbait hook at long distances from the boat. It is slightly softer than the 892 at the tip to midway down the rod, but once you get towards the backbone of the rod it retains tons of power while being parabolic. I was tossing a 5/16 swimmer in 40 feet of water and was easily able to reel-set the hook into the smallies 👍

​@JoeyDiCienzo thanks Joey! I've been trying to do research on both the 891 and 892 but there isn't much out right now. I've been throwing that juvy craw too! I was just worried that the 891 wouldn't be able to drive the hook. I'm almost tempted to buy both 😂

@@Shawn_Lai it can definitely drive the hook home! If you end up grabbing both though, all your problems will be solved (serotonin levels UP) 🤣

It will work very well. My most recent Short (on my page) gives a quick rundown on what I think of the 902c now that I've used it frequently. It should help you out😄

Thanks for the super quick response, I will check it out! :)

Eh thanks Gino!! Looking to get back down to your area soon 😎👍

Only a few more months and we'll be bacl at 'er!

Thanks Brent!

The 882 is a fantastic rod for neds/neko, finesse jigs and swimbaits (3 to 4" class). To compare the 902s and 882s is tricky but doable: both are incredibly parabolic (902 especially), but the IMX blank is slightly more powerful towards the cork of the rod, making it great around cover. Tip wise, the IMX has a 'more noticeable' tip action since it's extra fast vs the NRX+ fast action. However, for the techniques you listed, I would lean towards the 902s NRX+: the parabolic nature of the blank makes landing fish on light line with trebles and finesse single hooks easy. Similarly, the quality of the NRX+ blank (spiral-x and high power-x tech) for anything deemed highly finesse makes the light bites much easier to detect. Sorry for the long response but I hope it helped Dennis!

I really appreciate the detailed review. It’s tough to get any information on that 882 NRR.

H8r vibes 😝

@@JoeyDiCienzo I woke up and chose violence today 😆

@@patrickzajdel dont you have things to do? 🤣 #ElectronicZ

Thank you very much ☺hope you learned something also!

Thank you! Its definitely a challenge but crucial to get the followers. Youre right though, most lakes are 1 rod at a time 👌👍

One of the biggest lakes in the Great Lakes system too, you're 100% right! You should've seen the legs on the co-angler... toothpicks! 🤣🤣🤣

Appreciate you watching and learning! Definitely a good idea when you need to cover an area on big lakes 👍 try it

The audacity eh? 😉🤣 ahaha

MIDDDDSSS

Mainly rock Wes 👌 appreciate you watching 😁

🤣🤣

Please see my more recent erie videos for explanations 👍👊

@@JoeyDiCienzo we just switched the water plan and headed to cayuga

And most times, the nail 🤣

Used to allow fishing there but not anymore. Owners dont allow it anymore

It is going to be priced very similar to Sniper for roughly the same sized spool. 90m spools won't be the only size made either from what i've heard

Got a few more coming out, been real busy 👍 thanks Andy!!

Thank you!

Appreciate it! The south shore.

This video was a Sylvan 1500. New boat is a Lund Explorer 18 foot 👍

I have fair skin so i do everything to protect from burns regardless of sun or wind👍

Really depends on what feel you want. The Exsence is the lightest of the 3, followed by the TP and then Stella. The drag on all of them is 20 lb maximum. The TP has the lowest gear ratio of the three at 5.3:1, the Stella comes in at 5.8:1, and the Exsence at 6.0:1. At this level, they are all incredible reels and you wont go wrong with either of them. If you want to research the technogies in each, refer to the website here for further info 👍 fish.shimano.com/content/fish/northamerica/us/en/homepage/Spinning_Reels.html

@@JoeyDiCienzo so you prefer the 2500 over the 3000? I was leaning towards the 3000 for the higher gear ratios. Not to concerned with weight but I am curious how the 901’s balance is with the light exsence, didn’t want it to feel tip heavy

@@julianojanuario4012 it wont be tip heavy whatsoever, the balance point of the combo will super be close to the top of the cork! And yes, i prefer 2500 in all of my reels (with the exception of the Exsence because as you know, the 3000 is the same size as a standard 2500). No real reason for my selection of the 2500 size other than the fact that i'm too lazy to swap the T knobs off of a 3000 reel 👍 (which i did with my current Exsence)

@@JoeyDiCienzo appreciate the info. I ended up ordering a Stella 3000. I’m not crazy about the t handle either, will probably swap it out.

@@julianojanuario4012 Good stuff Juliano! Glad for you and hope you enjoy!